Bluesmoke

… just a few ideas for you to think about

Archive for February, 2010

Social Networking and Business

Thursday, February 11th, 2010
social network logos

Social Networking Logos

If businesses haven’t yet woken up to the potential of SN they certainly need to.  To quote Bill Gates, its the way we are all communicating with each other these days…

We can all think of 1001 reasons why we could well do without the extra hassle of yet another foray into the mysteries of online marketing.
But if all you do is take a  moment to read some of the stats below, then maybe it might be convince you its time to ask your kids for a few tips on where to start.

Facebook Example…

So lets have  a look at some stats first of all. If we take a look at one of the fastest growing SN sites Facebook and have a look at their stats for a moment:

  • they claim to have 350 million active users.
  • Each user has on average has 130 friends and is a member of 12 groups.
  • 700,000 local businesses have active pages on Facebook.
  • Facebook’s average of 55 mins for each user visit

The trivia argument often levelled at SN sites now starts looking a bit weak in business terms. If you have have ever taken the time to look at the stats for your own site to see how long visitors are staying on pages, compare this to Facebook’s average of 55 mins for each user visit and you begin to see the  potential.

Sharing Vs Selling

The one thing that is radically different is in the way users interact with content. Perhaps our own carefully crafted websites were built on the assumption that we should simply present information as  a ‘one off’ without necesarily elliciting users responses (after all, it took us long enough to write the content in the first place).  But if we want to really engage potential consumers we have to allow them opportunities to express their thoughts, opinions etc., in a way a static page of text on a website cannot hope to do.  In so doing we are gathering valuable market research and feedback; our web pages are also ‘enriched’ by the extra (free) generated page content, which is all good news when MR Google pays our site a visit .

Content for free?

Businesses are certainly getting the message and eager to tap into the huge potential. Facebook  are actually keen for businesses to leverage content within own sites if we want to do this via their integration tools like Facebook connect . facebook also does all the hard work by actively prompting and encouraging members to join groups and add friends with similar interests. And not forgetting all this generates all important extra  content +  backlinks to our site – and its free! . (cf. Huffington Post -a news aggregator website which actually thrives on ‘pulling’ the majority of its content from other sites)

The youtube example:

Youtube stats? Oh just watch the clip!

Suffice it to say that user numbers are now in  billions and still growing (14.5 at the last estimate.)   You tube also enables us to test out the market very quickly and efficiently – whether you want to publish your own movie, slideshow or even embed the content on your own site, Youtube has  to be dream come true in terms of free advertising –  the tools are all there free to use for you to make it happen i.e., creating engaging user content easily without having the overhead costs. (e.g.,check out Capri Sun’s channel on Youtube )

Summary thoughts about Youtube:

  • … is available universally and is free
  • …frequently outperforms conventional media channels
  • …provides feedback via viewer stats and comments
  • … offers (free)embedding/agreggating  of content
  • rapid and easy publishing and editing for more flexible marketing strategy
  • huge viral marketing possibilities

A word of caution

Yep -there’s no such thing as a free lunch.  We can’t just think of SN sites as free advertising. They do have to be engaging (c.f. Facebook page visit time of 55 mins) so be prepared to offer something that is of real interest and benefits to the user – don’t just think of this as one way traffic.  Put yourself in the place of somone who is  SN savvy – they will very see through any sales ploys (however subliminal) to market your product.

Summary:

Remember any good viral marketing has to be user- driven also  so:

  • Be prepared to share information, even offer free services or benefits(go on – dangle the odd carrot!) give feedback and encourage comments about products/services.
  • Get up to speed – draw on your staff expertise and knowledge of blogging twittering etc discuss which are the best SN sites for your business and how they could be best utilised
  • Get involved/become members of other related groups(e.g. follow in Twitter)
  • Don’t be afraid to fail – review  and discuss your strategy as you would any other marketing campaign
  • Don’t forget to switch on your Stats (Google analytics preferably) to monitor popularity of product/service/topic interest

Perhaps next time you are reviewing your marketing strategy perhaps Social Networking will move high up your ‘must do’ marketing agenda.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Badger Cull Looms Closer

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

Its looking more likely that the Badger cull in Pembrokeshire, Wales will go ahead despite widespread opposition from organisations such as the RSPCA,RSPB and Badger Trust. 1000 badgers will be shot in an area of North Pembrokeshire in an attempt to stem the rising cost of compensation payments to farmers, although previous culls competely failed to halt the increase in Bovine TB. The ‘Lets see if it works’ approach proposed by Rural affairs minister Elin Jones and supported by Plaid Cymru seems more to with appeasing the farming community than adopting  a scientific approach to dealing with the disease.

The lack of public consultation has angered Labour A.M. Lorraine Barrett who has openly expressed her opposition to the cull, but the increased financial implications has forced a knee jerk reaction from the Assembly Government.  Environment Secretary Hilary Benn has ruled out the need for culling and favours  a more scientific programme of vaccination  in  England, which is likely to go ahead from 2011.

Despite the recent protestations it now looks unlikely that anyone outside the Assembly building  will have any say this matter.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/7962285.stm

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Unveiling the Apple iPad

Monday, February 1st, 2010

As Steve Jobs unveils the latest Apple creation (or re-creation) the sceptics are out in force ‘slating’ the iPad (no pun intended) before it even goes into full production. But where will this reincarnation sit amongst all our other techno- gadgets, and is it likely to be one step too far in an already overcrowded marketplace?  Will its niche in the market remain just that – a niche market composed mainly of Apple junkies?

There are a number of pointers that may indicate that Apple/Steve Jobs may have the thinking right on this one (again).  We know that there are already a plethora of similar devices all vying for our attention, but with perhaps one big glaring difference.  All the tablets, e-readers, Kimbles and the like have  never quite hit the mark when it comes to simplifying usability.  When the The iPhone entered the mobile device fray it was initially met with a mixed reaction(apart from the Mac devotees who embraced it straightaway) –  yet it has revolutionised mobile phone  ’architecture’, leaving others slightly lagging  despite all their best efforts.

The iPad incoroporates all the ‘touchy feeliness’  of its pocket predecessors with touch screen, drag, flick, etc navigation but now  in a larger format, which has to be better for typing and thumbing the pages of e-books.
But why (I hear you say) does the paperback  continue to prevail? Maybe its to do with the tactile way we can browse a book And its certainly not through the want of trying by Sony, Amazon et al.
Mr Jobs and co’s philosophy has always been to build devices with the end user user experience in mind rather than fill it full of gadgetry. Exactly the reason why the iPhone became such a hit leaving other devices playing ‘catchy-uppy’.

End our love affair with the mouse?  - Never!

Perhaps we have now become too attached to that little slidey object by our computers and now is the time  to embrace the touch-screen with both fingers. ( If champanzees have mastered it I’m sure we can in time. )
Seriously,  its high likely all the appealing ‘ergonomics’ of the iPhone will work beautifully in a bigger device and entice us even more.

Size matters
I think the iPad’s achilles heel may in fact be its size (I bet they thought long and hard about this). Again it all depends what we use it for, although for a portable its a tad heavy to pop into your trouser pocket, but perfect for a college or office bag, which perhaps indicates the target market.  However I can see major advantages of having a bigger device  for car journeys  - maps, web browsing, watching movies etc .

Conclusion

Will the iPad find a place in our lives alongside the other techno-toys? – too early to say perhaps.   It might be trying to do all things quite well but none really well. And its market share will only ever be marginal. Nevertheless, I have to admit that I still want  one – in the certain knowledge its probably going to be damn good.

Some (stolen) stats

  • 9.7 inch display
  • Touch screen
  • 1.5 pounds, 1/2 inch thick
  • 1 ghz apple A4 chip, 16 to 64 GB flash storage
  • WiFi 802.11n
  • Bluetooth 2.1 +EDR
  • Speaker, Microphone, 30-pin connector
  • Accelerometer & Compass
  • 10 Hours of active battery life, 1 month of battery life on stand by
  • Earth-friendly!
  • Every iPad has WiFi support, some models have 3G support
  • lack of built in camera and 3G support as standard.  There is also
  • iBooks store interface just like iTunes.
  • Turn pages by swiping, just like a real book
  • Interface very similar to the iPhone, but bigger. Flick and touch controls throughout
  • New version of iTunes specific to the iPad, flick controls
  • iBooks is next. This is where Apple tries to take on the Kindle
  • iWorks for the iPad.
  • “The gadget is a premium mobile device, not a computer; as such we see some iPod Touch buyers stepping up to the iPad, but consumers looking for an affordable portable computer will likely stick with the MacBook line up,” said Gene Munster of Piper Jaffray.
  • Analysts also believe the gadget could cannibalise the e-reader market, currently dominated by Amazon’s Kindle and Sony’s Reader.
  • A 32GB iPad will cost $599 (£376) and a 64GB will cost $699 (£439). Apple has given no hint about exact UK prices and final costs may be higher than direct conversions suggest.
  • Can only run one application at a time – major weakness!

(stats courtesy of BBC technology pages and  others)


Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)